Why did Switzerland’s Breel Embolo receive a red card against Argentina?

See more of our coverage in your search results. Switzerland’s World Cup ended in controversial fashion in a referee decision that will be debated long after the tournament ends. Swiss striker Breel Embolo was shown a second yellow card for simulation in the 72nd minute of Saturday night’s controversial 3-1 quarterfinal loss to Argentina at Arrowhead Stadium, a decision that completely changed the complexion of the match and left everyone involved with Switzerland furious. In real time, it looked as though Argentina midfielder Leandro Paredes had recklessly clipped Embolo inside the attacking third. Referee João Pinheiro immediately showed Paredes a yellow card, even as he claimed he didn’t make contact with Embolo. Seconds later, the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) halted play and summoned the referee to the pitch-side monitor. What followed was easily one of the most controversial moments of the entire 2026 FIFA World Cup. After a lengthy review, Pinheiro overturned the yellow card against Paredes, and instead issued the card to Embolo. The referee ruled that Embolo had simulated the contact and under FIFA’s new mistaken identity rule, had to switch the yellow card from Paredes to the Swiss striker. Embolo, who had already been shown a yellow card in the first half for a tough tackle, was shown a red card for accumulating two yellows and was sent off in tears as stunned teammates surrounded him. The new rule allows referees to reverse a booking if video determines the foul was actually committed by the opposing player. Or in this case, if no foul occurred at all and simulation was the real offense. Without that new rule, Paredes would have remained booked and Embolo would have stayed on the field. If Paredes had already been shown a yellow card, he would have been the player sent off. The mistaken identity rule also occurred earlier in the tournament in the United States opening match against Paraguay. Defender Tim Ream was shown a yellow card for a tackle on forward Miguel Almiron that would have given Paraguay a free kick just outside the box. VAR alerted the referee to go to the monitor where upon review, it was clear that Ream never touched Almiron and instead the decision was overturned and the Paraguay forward was booked for simulation. Regardless of the new rule, Swiss manager Murat Yakin blasted the decision after the match. “There was definitely no reason to award a yellow card,” Yakin said. “It was a harmless situation. He should have let play continue. We were punished because of a rule that is unacceptable. I don’t understand it. It destroyed our game. It’s unfair.” Former MLS striker Bradley Wright-Phillips said he sympathized with Switzerland, but not with Embolo himself, arguing the striker’s actions may have cost his nation a place in the semifinals. Former Jamaica international Jobi McAnuff agreed the replay showed clear simulation, while admitting it was still painful to watch a World Cup dream end in such dramatic fashion. Whether viewed as justice or excessive punishment, the decision instantly became another defining moment in the tournament that is increasingly being remembered for VAR’s role in the matches rather than the games being played themselves. California Post News: Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, YouTube, WhatsApp, LinkedInCalifornia Post Sports Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, XCalifornia Post Opinion California Post Newsletters: Sign up here!California Post App: Download here!Home delivery: Sign up here!Page Six Hollywood: Sign up here!

Read the full report at New York Post ↗