Let’s build a children’s public internet
An increasing number of people seem to agree the internet is terrible for children - allegedly addictive, destructive to self-esteem, possibly a portal to predators. Over the past year, several countries have started requiring stringent age verification or outright bans for minors.
Reported by 2 outlets — The Verge, Seattle Times. See all sources ↓
An increasing number of people seem to agree the internet is terrible for children - allegedly addictive, destructive to self-esteem, possibly a portal to predators. Over the past year, several countries have started requiring stringent age verification or outright bans for minors. At the end of June in the US, the House of Representatives passed the Kids Internet and Digital Safety (KIDS) Act, the latest in a string of attempted online child safety regulations. A couple of days later, a Pew Research Center survey found over half of US respondents favored a ban on social media for anyone under 16.
Read the full report at The Verge ↗
Why it matters
2 outlets are covering this world story — one to watch as reporting develops.
- What's the story?
- An increasing number of people seem to agree the internet is terrible for children - allegedly addictive, destructive to self-esteem, possibly a portal to predators. Over the past year, several countries have started requiring stringent age verification or outright bans for minors.
- How widely is it covered?
- 2 outlets, average source rating 6.0/10.
- When was it last updated?
- 11m ago.
How outlets are framing the same story
Here's how each outlet is covering the story — compare their headlines and timing at a glance.
- Coverage card1 outlet1CoverageScouting report
Let’s build a children’s public internet
Sources1TypeCoverageThe Verge
- Coverage card1 outlet2CoverageScouting report
Social media age bans aren’t perfect. So what?
Sources1TypeCoverageSeattle Times